<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deducting IRA Losses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.figuide.com/deducting-ira-losses.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.figuide.com/deducting-ira-losses.html</link>
	<description>FiGuide&#039;s free daily tips provides short, actionable strategies to help you achieve a successful, worry-free retirement.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:33:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Blankenship, CFP®, EA</title>
		<link>http://www.figuide.com/deducting-ira-losses.html#comment-3747</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Blankenship, CFP®, EA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 21:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialducksinarow.com/?p=1837#comment-3747</guid>
		<description>Hi, Jeff -

If the client has distributed all of his trad IRA accounts in the tax year then the loss (versus the basis) should be deductible as a miscellaneous itemized deduction.  It shouldn&#039;t matter (as far as I know) that the distribution resulted in a Roth conversion, since it&#039;s still a distribution.  

He *may* have to pay all of the tax on the 2010 return (instead of spreading it) since he&#039;s recognizing the loss in 2010... you should follow up on that possibility.  If it was me doing the return I&#039;d recommend going that route to be conservative.

jb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Jeff -</p>
<p>If the client has distributed all of his trad IRA accounts in the tax year then the loss (versus the basis) should be deductible as a miscellaneous itemized deduction.  It shouldn&#8217;t matter (as far as I know) that the distribution resulted in a Roth conversion, since it&#8217;s still a distribution.  </p>
<p>He *may* have to pay all of the tax on the 2010 return (instead of spreading it) since he&#8217;s recognizing the loss in 2010&#8230; you should follow up on that possibility.  If it was me doing the return I&#8217;d recommend going that route to be conservative.</p>
<p>jb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.figuide.com/deducting-ira-losses.html#comment-3729</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialducksinarow.com/?p=1837#comment-3729</guid>
		<description>I have a client who had a significant loss in tIRA&#039;s with basis. He did a conversion of all those IRA&#039;s to Roth IRA&#039;s. Does the conversion allow him to take a deduction for the losses or does he have to actually take distribution of the monies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a client who had a significant loss in tIRA&#8217;s with basis. He did a conversion of all those IRA&#8217;s to Roth IRA&#8217;s. Does the conversion allow him to take a deduction for the losses or does he have to actually take distribution of the monies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

